With Election Day coming up fast, I still have not decided whether or not I should vote. I understand that it is my civic duty to give my opinion on who would best run the country, and frankly I couldn't care less about this election.
The way I see it, I am no part of a concern from either of the two candidates, and I am barely a concern from the 3rd party candidates. If my job as a voter is to give an opinion on who the electoral college selects, then here is my opinion.
The idea of voting has been lost on me being a non-Democrat in a (currently) strongly Democratic state of Illinois. For my entire life the concept of voting for a non-Democrat has fallen on deaf ears in Illinois since they run on the "all-or-nothing" electoral college setup where the popular vote earns the candidate all the electoral college votes. In a state with a large number of votes like California (55), Texas (38), Illinois (20), Florida (29), etc. it is hard to say all or nothing. In these cases the percent of popular vote should affect how many votes go to each candidate.
For example, in Illinois last election, Barack Obama received 61.8% of the votes, and John McCain received 36.9% of the votes. In an ideal situation where all states gave out the votes proportionately, the 21 (at the time) electoral college votes would be separated out that Obama would get 13 votes, McCain would get 8 votes. Now this system wouldn't be perfect still because there would be cases where people receiving votes would not get an electoral vote. On the same example, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, Cynthia McKinney, and Chuck Baldwin all received less than 1% of the vote, that mathematically earns them a vote from the college, but doesn't earn them credit from the college.
In just looking at the primary two candidates from 2008, the electoral college official total was 365 for Obama and 173 for McCain. If the system I proposed where the state votes based on the popular vote alone and not an all or nothing system, assuming that the state would round up to the benefit of the popular vote, the totals are still in favor of President Obama, however, he wins by much less of a margin (289-249 give or take 2 for mistyping in calculator).
Not only could this change the course of the election, but it actually takes the people of the country's opinion into account. Now in this system there is a bit of a flaw where in the case where a candidate does not get 270 votes because they are spread out over many candidates. I found out that in the case of a tie or neither candidate reaches 270 the House of Representatives elect the President and the Senate elects the Vice President. In theory then, there can be a Democratic President and a Republican Vice President, which I think would be really cool.
Now, I am fully aware that this is just frivolous thought, but what is the internet but a tool to share frivolous thoughts and some educational information. Also, while this does not solve my indecision about voting, it does give me a touch of confidence that it would be possible to make the US function again "By the people and for the people".
Think about it and have a great day!
------------------------------------------
If you didn't really want to read political banter but you wanted to watch something amusing instead, watch the bad lip reading of the last Presidential debate called "Eye of the Sparrow".